Skip to main content Skip to secondary navigation
" "

Julia Olivieri

PhD candidate, Institute for Computational & Mathematical Engineering
I never used to think of myself as someone who’d study computer science, and I didn’t think of becoming an engineer until graduate school.

I didn’t even consider any CS classes in high school, because it seemed like the people taking them already knew a lot about computer science, and it was intimidating. I thought people like that were men who were very into video games and very self-motivated to do things on the computer. I eventually went to a small liberal arts college that didn’t have any engineering; I enjoyed math and science, but I also really liked English and history, and at one point considered majoring in English. I just followed my interests.

Things changed when I finally took an introductory course in computer science – the only CS course I took in college – along with courses in discrete math and biology. Soon after, I attended a conference for undergraduate women in mathematics that was filled with women with PhDs and female math professors. It made me feel like there was another world I hadn’t considered, and that a career in math and academia was achievable. Later, I spent a couple of summers doing research where I learned about computational biology, which joined my math and biology interests. It was exciting, and also taught me that I liked the computational side of research.

Right now I’m the co-president of Women in Mathematics, Statistics and Computational Engineering (WiMSCE) here at Stanford, and I work in the Salzman Lab, where I study individual cells that carry different versions of the same gene to understand how they differ from each other. The body is able to splice genes to create many variants of the same gene, and these variants can have very different functions and be implicated in cancers and disease. We now have the ability to see this process, and can get data from millions of individual cells, but to draw any conclusions from that data we need to use advanced computational methods. That’s what I focus on. In the future I think we’ll be able to use this information to learn not only how to more effectively treat disease and better understand how the human body works, but to understand what is shared biologically across the whole tree of life.

Next fall I’ll be an assistant professor of computer science at the University of the Pacific. I may not always have thought of myself as an engineer, in part because I used to associate it with doing something more physical than computation. But today I do, because I’m focused on practical solutions to real problems, and I can see that I’m starting to make a dent in understanding how the human body and its trillions of cells actually works.

Related spotlights

Portrait of Iro Armeni on a balcony in the Science and Engineering Quad.

Iro Armeni

Assistant Professor
Civil & Environmental Engineering
As a kid I would go to construction sites with my dad, a civil engineer, and he’d show me plans for putting reinforcement inside concrete columns. Together, we would count that the right amount of steel was there to protect a structure.
Read Iro Armeni's story
Portrait of Edward Apraku in the SEQ.

Edward Apraku

PhD candidate
Civil & Environmental Engineering
I was born in Kumasi, Ghana, and moved to the U.S. with my parents and older sister when I was 2 years old.
Read Edward Apraku's story
Portrait of Emma Kaeli standing outside in the Science and Engineering Quad

Emma Kaeli

PhD candidate
Materials Science and Engineering
When I first started college, someone asked if I wanted to join the Society of Women Engineers, but I didn’t understand the importance of getting involved at the time. I’d been raised in the small suburb of Medway, Massachusetts, and had always felt well-supported by family and friends in my STEM studies. It didn’t feel like I was experiencing any type of bias.
Read Emma Kaeli's story